|
Eternal Security
by Mike Stine
|
There
are few topics debated as fiercely in the theological
world as the subject of eternal security. It is a fair
topic to address as whether Christians can lose their
salvation or not should be very important to the way
every Christian lives their life. A back and forth
discussion format of this debate is also presented on
this site as was done for a school project several years
ago. Neither this article nor the discussion
should be considered exhaustive on the subject but
should provide an adequate overview on eternal security.
|
|
Eternal
security goes by many other terms such as Once Saved
Always Saved (OSAS is a common abbreviation)
perseverance of the saints, or preservation of the
saints. Perseverance of the saints is probably the most
proper term as used by Calvinists in their five points.
In
short, eternal security means that once a Christian has
become a Christian, there is absolutely nothing they can
do to lose their salvation. Scripture would indicate
that we are sealed with the Holy Spirit at the time of
salvation. 2 Corinthians 1:22 states, “He has also
sealed us and given us the Spirit as a down payment in
our hearts.” Likewise, Ephesians 4:30 states “And don’t
grieve God’s Holy Spirit, who sealed you for the day of
redemption.”
Romans
8:35-39 instructs us that nothing can separate us from
the love of Christ, “Who shall separate us from the love
of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or
famine or nakedness or danger or sword? As it is
written: ‘For your sake we face death all day long; we
are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.’ No, in all
these things we are more than conquerors through him who
loved us. For I am convinced that neither death nor
life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor
the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth,
nor anything else in all creation, will be able to
separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus
our Lord.”
The
perseverance of the saints is a key tenant of
Calvinistic beliefs. However, there are others who do
not consider themselves to be Calvinists who also hold
to this belief. For the Calvinist, it is almost
impossible to believe anything else.
Because
Calvinists believe in election by God, each and every
Christian has been chosen to receive salvation. The
“who”, “what”, and “how” of election varies within those
who hold to Calvinistic doctrines but is immaterial to
our argument. The importance is that God is the one who
does the calling and election and He is the one who is
sovereignly in control. Because of this, it would be
foolish (if not impossible) for God to choose someone He
would know would later lose their salvation. For such a
situation to occur, either God would not be able to know
those who would later reject Him, or he would know and
choose them regardless of that knowledge.
While
there is Biblical evidence in support of eternal
security, one cannot overlook evidence against it as
well. The book of Hebrews offers stark warnings against
those who would backslide in their faith. In the
letters to the churches in Revelation 2-3 Jesus offers
rewards “to those who overcome.” Those who argue
against eternal security will say that these passages
open up the possibility for a believer to backslide and
to not overcome.
Although undoubtedly many explanations have been given
for these verses, the most common is that such passages
are merely hypothetical and not meant as a warning but
as motivation for the believer. All Christians will
overcome because God will strengthen them supernaturally
with the help of the Holy Spirit.
Still
to be addressed are Christians who appear to have fallen
from faith. The stories are numerous and hard to
ignore. They include pastors caught in affairs to a
number of adults who made a profession of faith as a
child or teen but now want nothing to do with church.
Those who do not believe in eternal security will point
to such cases as proof positive that one can lose their
salvation.
James
Kennedy, founder of Evangelism Explosion and staunch
Calvinist writes about such a case in one of his books.
It has been some years since I read the book and I no
longer remember the title or all the exact details,
nevertheless, I remember Kennedy’s point well. While at
the funeral of a gang member in his early twenties he
happened upon the mother of the gunned down young man.
The mother was comforted by the fact that the young man
was a Christian because he made a profession of faith
when he was twelve. Kennedy goes on to write that
despite the young man’s earlier confession, he did not
wish to spend eternity chained alongside him.
Kennedy’s conclusion is that the young man was never a
true believer and thus it was not possible for him to
have lost his salvation. This would be a logical
conclusion and probably reached by 95% of the
evangelical community regardless of their stance on
eternal security.
Still,
the question persists of those who appear to be true
believers who get caught in a life of sin and walk away
from God and the church. Can it be said that a
supposedly faithful Christian of twenty years was never
really saved? Those in the eternal security camp split
on the issue. Some will say that indeed the person
never was truly saved and that if they had been, they
would never be able to walk away from the faith. Others
will say that although the person is living a sinful
life and has walked away from God, they are still a
Christian, albeit a carnal one. Carnal Christians is a
term that is often used to describe such people who once
appeared to be Christians but now do not.
God
does not turn a blind eye to carnal Christians but they
do not lose their salvation. An example of carnal
Christians, according to those who believe in eternal
security, is that of Ananias and Saphira. Peter catches
them in a lie and claims that they have lied to the Holy
Spirit. They are then struck dead. They lost their
life, but not their salvation. God acted and prevented
them from continuing in their life of sin.
The
issue of eternal security is an issue of salvation.
Regardless of whether one believes in eternal security
or not, they should have assurance of their salvation.
The Holy Spirit is proof of one’s salvation. While
charismatics and Pentecostals may require proof of the
Holy Spirit by speaking in tongues, other groups may
look for proof of the Spirit in the fruit of the
Spirit. Jesus makes it clear that God is looking for
fruit and fruit should be evident in the life of a
Christian.
On the
other hand, regardless of one’s stance on eternal
security, when we see a person who claims to be a
Christian but doesn’t live a life in accordance with
this, we need to do all that we can to get that person
back to walking with the Lord. Regardless whether there
is a true danger of losing one’s salvation or if this is
evidence they never were truly saved, this person is in
need of Christian help.
Although this issue is a divisive one, we should
remember that we are all in the business of saving
souls. In the end, it should not matter whether our
salvation is secure or not, we should be doing all we
can to walk in accordance with God’s Word and helping
others to do so as well. If we do so, we have
absolutely nothing to fear, regardless of which side is
correct.
To top of page |